Talk:Wharf
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Wharf article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1Auto-archiving period: 30 days ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
![]() Archives (Index) |
Well-known wharves?
[edit]At this point the "well-known wharves" is basically an advertising section for various seaside locations. Most of the content is not notable enough for this article. Frankly I don't believe a list of "well-known wharves" is necessary regardless for this article. I propose stripping the section entirely.
--Mcorazao (talk) 19:41, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
- OK, since there was no feedback I went ahead and removed this section as advertising. Please feel free to object/revert/whatever ... --Mcorazao (talk) 20:41, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
Merged
[edit]FYI: I merged quay with this article and redirected quay accordingly
--Mcorazao (talk) 20:41, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
- The etymology section does not even mention quay any longer. This merge seems inappropriate. 67.86.75.96 (talk) 17:50, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
- Not sure I understand. The original "Quay" article did not provide an etymology for the word. So what does "any longer" mean? --Mcorazao (talk) 04:39, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
Other Terms
[edit]Should terms like "pier", "dock" and "jetty" be defined and differentiated from "wharf" and "quay"? 98.244.137.86 (talk) 10:28, 7 May 2023 (UTC)kolef98.244.137.86 (talk) 10:28, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
Start a discussion about improving the Wharf page
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "Wharf" page.