Jump to content

Talk:Metal Gear Solid 2: Sons of Liberty

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good article nomineeMetal Gear Solid 2: Sons of Liberty was a Video games good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 4, 2008Good article nomineeNot listed

"METAL GEAR SOLID 2 SONS OF LIBIRTY" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect METAL GEAR SOLID 2 SONS OF LIBIRTY and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 11 § METAL GEAR SOLID 2 SONS OF LIBIRTY until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Dominicmgm (talk) 14:14, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Review of the Themes And Analysis Section

[edit]

I've been going through a lot of the sources for the section which analyzes the themes of the game and, apart from it coming off as "gushy", it attributes various blurb mentions of said themes that seem to have only been made in passing reference to it (such as "sexual orientation" and "incest"), and does not at all constitute being explored "in significant detail". There appears to be a whole plethora of links that have been dumped after a long laundry list of "philosophical themes" that the game supposedly expresses, which I do not have the time to cross-reference for each and every one. I think each specific philosophical theme should be cited individually, not given a dump of links at the tail end of a long list. Does anyone else agree? And shouldn't we only include said themes if they are actually explored in-depth instead of being mentioned off-hand? I'm also not sure how academically rigorous mentions of it in gaming publications in columns and opinion piece articles for places like "GamesRadar" and "Gamasutra" are, if we are to be truly exploring the philosophical merit of this game. MutedL (talk) 03:49, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]