This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
World War II is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination was archived. For older candidates, please check the archive.
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject European history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of Europe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European historyWikipedia:WikiProject European historyTemplate:WikiProject European historyEuropean history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
World War II is part of the WikiProject Albania, an attempt to co-ordinate articles relating to Albania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page so as to become familiar with the guidelines. If you would like to participate, please join the project and help with our open tasks.AlbaniaWikipedia:WikiProject AlbaniaTemplate:WikiProject AlbaniaAlbania articles
World War II is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Austria, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles about Austria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project.AustriaWikipedia:WikiProject AustriaTemplate:WikiProject AustriaAustria articles
World War II is part of the WikiProject Bosnia and Herzegovina, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Bosnia and Herzegovina on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Bosnia and HerzegovinaWikipedia:WikiProject Bosnia and HerzegovinaTemplate:WikiProject Bosnia and HerzegovinaBosnia and Herzegovina articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brazil, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Brazil and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrazilWikipedia:WikiProject BrazilTemplate:WikiProject BrazilBrazil articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bulgaria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bulgaria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BulgariaWikipedia:WikiProject BulgariaTemplate:WikiProject BulgariaBulgaria articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Croatia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Croatia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CroatiaWikipedia:WikiProject CroatiaTemplate:WikiProject CroatiaCroatia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Czech Republic, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Czech Republic on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Czech RepublicWikipedia:WikiProject Czech RepublicTemplate:WikiProject Czech RepublicCzech Republic articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greek history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hungary, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hungary on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HungaryWikipedia:WikiProject HungaryTemplate:WikiProject HungaryHungary articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 11:31, August 26, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lithuania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lithuania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LithuaniaWikipedia:WikiProject LithuaniaTemplate:WikiProject LithuaniaLithuania articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Moldova, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Moldova on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MoldovaWikipedia:WikiProject MoldovaTemplate:WikiProject MoldovaMoldova articles
This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the Netherlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.NetherlandsWikipedia:WikiProject NetherlandsTemplate:WikiProject NetherlandsNetherlands articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Romania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Romania-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RomaniaWikipedia:WikiProject RomaniaTemplate:WikiProject RomaniaRomania articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Serbia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Serbia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SerbiaWikipedia:WikiProject SerbiaTemplate:WikiProject SerbiaSerbia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Silesia, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.SilesiaWikipedia:WikiProject SilesiaTemplate:WikiProject SilesiaSilesia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Slovakia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Slovakia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SlovakiaWikipedia:WikiProject SlovakiaTemplate:WikiProject SlovakiaSlovakia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Slovenia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Slovenia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SloveniaWikipedia:WikiProject SloveniaTemplate:WikiProject SloveniaSlovenia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soviet Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Soviet UnionWikipedia:WikiProject Soviet UnionTemplate:WikiProject Soviet UnionSoviet Union articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is part of WikiProject Vietnam, an attempt to create a comprehensive, neutral, and accurate representation of Vietnam on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.VietnamWikipedia:WikiProject VietnamTemplate:WikiProject VietnamVietnam articles
World War II is within the scope of WikiProject Zimbabwe, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Zimbabwe and Zimbabwe-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.ZimbabweWikipedia:WikiProject ZimbabweTemplate:WikiProject ZimbabweZimbabwe articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Show citation statistics for CS1 and CS2 citation elements in the article.
Stats: unnamed refs = 187; named refs = 101; self closed = 14. Click show for details.
I suppose that would depend on whether you include the September 18th Mukden Incident as part of the invasion or not. The actual military operation to occupy Manchuria began on the 19th. Mediatech492 (talk) 02:47, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
My request is to add Karl Doenitz, Hideki Tojo, on behalf of Axis Powers, and Harry Truman, Clement Attlee, and Neville Chamberlain on behalf for the allies. Ryansean071 (talk) 23:56, 07 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The current material reflects the outcomes of a very large number of previous discussions. 09:26, 8 July 2024 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nick-D (talk • contribs)
I requested this text to replace the paragraph about the Battle of Britain as is more descriptive and the current text plays down the UK's involvement:
The Battle of Britain, fought from July to October 1940, was the first major military campaign conducted entirely by air forces. It started with the Luftwaffe attacking ships and harbours, then they aimed to achieve air superiority over the British RAF by attacking airfields, infrastructure, aircraft production facilities, and eventually civilian targets. Despite initial successes, the Luftwaffe failed to defeat the RAF Fighter Command, leading Hitler to postpone the planned invasion of Britain indefinitely. The conflict evolved into a strategic bombing campaign known as the Blitz, targeting London and other cities at night, but this too failed to significantly disrupt the British war effort and largely ended by May 1941. Germany's failure to destroy Britain's air defences was the first major German defeat and a crucial turning point in the conflict.
The current text also infers that Britain turned down a peace deal, the deal was that Germany could occupy continental Europe and is widely regarded as propaganda which would not be honoured.
Interestingly Britannica phrases it like this in their main WW2 article:
Victory in the air battle for the Luftwaffe would indeed have exposed Great Britain to invasion and occupation. The victory by the Royal Air Force (RAF) Fighter Command blocked this possibility and, in fact, created the conditions for Great Britain’s survival, for the extension of the war, and for the eventual defeat of Nazi Germany. 117PXL (talk) 12:08, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have removed the reference to Britain rejecting the Nazi "peace offer" after Germany's conquest of France as it is poorly sourced and a trope which is widely used in neo-Nazi propaganda. Basically, the Nazis asked Britain to give up. I have also slightly changed the wording to make it more natural in English. As for the rest of your proposed text, I think the current wording makes the same point more concisely. But let's see what others think. Aemilius Adolphin (talk) 23:22, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I fully understand the detail is not required, so I would like to add the sentence: "It was the first major German defeat and a crucial turning point in the conflict." (fully cited) Which is a key sentence from the intro of the Battle of Britain page in paragraph 4. As we have now removed the 'Peace Deal' sentence, this could replace it without any extra length to the page. It's a key sentence which is toned back as it could easily say Britain successfully beat the the German's in the Battle of Britain which forced them to retreat and prevented a land invasion. 117PXL (talk) 06:29, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The article already states that the result of the Battle of Britain was the indefinite postponement of the German plan to invade Britain. Going on to say that this was "a crucial turning point in the conflict" (which conflict?) and basing this on one source is going too far. Didn't Germany go on to invade Yugoslavia, Greece and the Soviet Union after this? All the books on the war I have read state that the Soviet Union forcing Germany to retreat in December 1941 was the crucial turning point in the European conflict. But let's see what others think. Aemilius Adolphin (talk) 08:35, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Modern sources tend to play down the Battle of Britain a bit, noting that Germany was doomed to failure in this campaign from the outset due to the strength of the RAF and Royal Navy as well as the British economy. Nick-D (talk) 10:31, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It was Germany's first major defeat which was a huge deal and also it changed their direction of travel and invaded countries East instead. Multiple sources state this...
"In the event, the battle was won by the Royal Air Force(RAF) Fighter Command, whose victory not only blocked the possibility of invasion but also created the conditions for Great Britain’s survival, for the extension of the war, and for the eventual defeat of Nazi Germany." Britannica
"Meanwhile, Berlin turned to a new objective. Hitler in December ordered his forces to prepare for Operation Barbarossa, the invasion and destruction of Russia." https://www.airandspaceforces.com/article/0808battle/
"During the Battle of Britain, the Luftwaffe was dealt an almost lethal blow from which it never fully recovered."
Going to have to agree with the others that stated that there already seems to be sufficient coverage, I also do not believe these sources you have cited (one of them a blog advertising watches) are suitable WP:RS for such a crucial and high profile article. TylerBurden (talk) 15:57, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your response, I sourced those immediately from the web, I can easily get similar quotes from textbooks or journals. My concern is that sources like Britannica make a big deal about it, have a look at their text. 117PXL (talk) 16:45, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Also Chat GPT, Claude AI and Microsoft Copilot all put the 'Battle of Britain' in the top 10 key events in WW2, therefore we should look expanding the amount of text as well. I understand it isn't in US history as they joined the war later. 117PXL (talk) 19:07, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I tried to take into account the above discussion and added the following as the text misses out the significance of the battle, also we've removed a sentence:
At the height of the battle, the RAF had only 749 fighter aircraft available, against 2,550 Luftwaffe aircraft. It was the first major battle fought entirely in the air and Nazi Germany’s first major military defeat.
I felt this clarified what the battle was and and explained it's significance, is there any objections to this particulate text? Thanks. 117PXL (talk) 10:42, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Well for a start, this is one source (a wp:primary one). Secondly, whilst they may say "MAJOR" other battles are claimed to be the first German defeat (such as Narvik), so (again) we need multiple (and third party) sources claiming this. Slatersteven (talk) 10:51, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think it improves the article. The figures on the number of aircraft in the air are meaningless without a detailed discussion of what type of aircraft they were, how far they had to fly, whether they had an effective fighter escort and a million other factors. The content about whether it was a major defeat is subjective and contested. You seem to think that the article understates the importance of the Battle of Britian but that's a debatable position best discussed in an article about the Battle of Britain or the historiography of WWII. Aemilius Adolphin (talk) 11:10, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think the number of planes shows the reality of what the pilots were up against, but yes the British planes were regarded superior. I think these stats give the reader a good visual image of what is happening. The stats simplify things for an overview just as other simplified sentences on the page do. If it needs to say that the British planes were superior that is not a problem. 117PXL (talk) 11:43, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I can see the battle of Narvik did start a little earlier but had less of an impact on the war, so your points are noted regarding that. 117PXL (talk) 11:45, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Likewise talking about the Battle of Britain without saying what it was is also meaningless. The next paragraph also reads badly, the Germans attacked undefended merchant vessels but it reads like they beat the British Navy. 117PXL (talk) 11:54, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The article is worded so the British can't have a success over the Germans but the Germans can have a success over the British. It needs fixing. 81.78.69.222 (talk) 12:25, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
"Most major belligerents attempted to solve the problems of complexity and security involved in using large codebooks for cryptography by designing ciphering machines, the most well-known being the German Enigma machine. Development of SIGINT (signals intelligence) and cryptanalysisenabled the countering process of decryption. Notable examples were the Allied decryption of Japanese naval codes and British Ultra, a pioneering method for decoding Enigma that benefited from information given to the United Kingdom by the Polish Cipher Bureau, which had been decoding early versions of Enigma before the war."
Nothing about Bletchley Park, Alan Turing or how the code breaking was a game changer and helped win the Battle of the Atlantic. 117PXL (talk) 19:26, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This is a very high level article on the war, that covers most major battles in a single sentence (or sometimes even less). The level of coverage seems OK for this. Nick-D (talk) 07:50, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
"...and it set the foundation for the international order for the rest of the 20th century and into the 21st century." -> "...and it set the foundation of international order for the rest of the 20th century and into the 21st century"? Fred Gandt · talk · contribs01:34, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think "of international relations" sounds better than "of international order". "The international order" is a common phrase with a different meaning than "international order". Aemilius Adolphin (talk) 03:36, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
For the sides of ww2 it just says Allies and Axis and under that the leaders. Shouldn’t it have the actual countries listed like it does for every other war article? MaxwellWinnie102 (talk) 14:59, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
A good idea would be to add Charles de Gaulle, leader of Free France. He was the leader of a country that became a permanent member of the UN Security Council (as did China). So I don't see the reason for it not being mentioned (like Kai Shek) Νίκος Αστέρης (talk) 18:58, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Paste the n ame into the search box at the top of the page under "Discussions on this page often lead to previous arguments being restated. Please read recent comments, look in the archives, and review the FAQ before commenting." and then click "search Archive". Slatersteven (talk) 09:22, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
One (non so common but possible) suggestion for the start date of WWII in Europe could be said to begin with the first day of the Italian invasion of Albania on 1939-04-07. 130.238.112.129 (talk) 18:49, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]