Talk:Outsider art
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Outsider art article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 90 days |
This level-4 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened:
|
Splitting hairs -- Art Brut vs outsider art
[edit]Art Brut -- as a term came first and was coined by Jean Dubuffet and is centered mainly on child-like naive, primitive works where as ...
Outsider Art -- is ANY art that is created by someone untrained outside of the traditional art world. Slacker13 (talk) 15:23, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
- Agreed with the Teahouse talk. Art brut, (French: “raw art”) really deserves its own page, not nestled here. There was even a Companie de L’Art Brut set up to collect and study Art Brut, which is now housed in the museum, La Collection de l’Art Brut in Lausanne, Switzerland. Avignonesi (talk) 16:47, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the agreement! Slacker13 (talk) 03:32, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
- I would like to see evidence from art historians that these are really two discrete topics rather than French and English terms for essentially the same topic. Cullen328 (talk) 19:14, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
- I found it in this book: https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=uajFzNpyJC8C&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=art+brut+vs+outsider+art&ots=1BpFce9Fa0&sig=_uFofq9I9BATWiugqiZq9_zrvc0#v=onepage&q=art%20brut%20vs%20outsider%20art&f=false. Pulling some excerpts....
- and this paper: https://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1313&context=jstae
- Related, often inter-changed -- but actually two distinct terms. Slacker13 (talk) 18:48, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
- I would like to see evidence from art historians that these are really two discrete topics rather than French and English terms for essentially the same topic. Cullen328 (talk) 19:14, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the agreement! Slacker13 (talk) 03:32, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
One of the references in this article is linking to a 404 page.
[edit]Particularly "Prinz, Jesse. "Against outsider art." Journal of Social Philosophy 48.3 (2017): 250-272.[1]".
Is there anything that can be done about it? I'd love to read up on it.
Thanks. EnviousBird (talk) 18:25, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
Adding a section about criticism of the term
[edit]Many pages on Wikipedia have criticism sections. This page does not. But the term Outsider Art has been notably criticized many times. I am thinking of adding a section. What process should I go through to add one? Krɪt̮ɪkl feɪjəɹ (talk) 18:26, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Krɪt̮ɪkl feɪjəɹ,
- Be bold! --u9000 (they/them • talk) 15:22, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
Start a discussion about improving the Outsider art page
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "Outsider art" page.
- C-Class vital articles
- Wikipedia level-4 vital articles
- Wikipedia vital articles in Arts
- C-Class level-4 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-4 vital articles in Arts
- C-Class vital articles in Arts
- C-Class visual arts articles
- WikiProject Visual arts articles
- C-Class Folklore articles
- Low-importance Folklore articles
- WikiProject Folklore articles
- Pages in the Wikipedia Top 25 Report