Talk:Fiasco

Untitled

VfD vote - removed April 16, 2004 - no concensus to delete

Disambig?

This article seems to have little focus, mentioning a varied set of things with the name "Fiasco". Perhaps it would be better to give each thing its own article with greater length than seen here, and turn this into a disambig page? --Jemiller226 04:43, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Fiasco Fiasco Fiasco?

Anybody else find it funny that the section devoted to the misuse of the word fiasco to denote a confused mess, itself uses "fiasco" in the sense of "a confused mess"? So, to the extent it may have not been named ironically (and it wasn't a registered user so it's hard to know), the section itself is a fiasco in the real sense.

Johndodd 05:26, 27 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

this american life

http://thislife.org/pages/descriptions/97/61.html
'Fiasco!' on "This American Life"

Is "far fiasco" the correct Italian?

I would have expected the Italian to be "fare un fiasco". I haven't edited the page because I am not a native Italian speaker. NickNak 13:16, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

2007-06-10 Automated pywikipediabot message

This page has been transwikied to Wiktionary.
The article has content that is useful at Wiktionary. Therefore the article can be found at either here or here (logs 1 logs 2.)
Note: This means that the article has been copied to the Wiktionary Transwiki namespace for evaluation and formatting. It does not mean that the article is in the Wiktionary main namespace, or that it has been removed from Wikipedia's. Furthermore, the Wiktionarians might delete the article from Wiktionary if they do not find it to be appropriate for the Wiktionary.
Removing this tag will usually trigger CopyToWiktionaryBot to re-transwiki the entry. This article should have been removed from Category:Copy to Wiktionary and should not be re-added there.

--CopyToWiktionaryBot 07:35, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]