Jump to content

User talk:janbrogger

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

broken afds?

[edit]

Janbrogger, You apparently put afds on several articles including Mġarr (which is a real town- why are you requesting its deletion?)s , but the afd link goes to something relating to the Barony of Tabria. please clarifyѕʀʟ·

See the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barony of Tabria discussion for a reply. The Mgarr entry was based on original research, non-reputable sources. It has been provisionally fixed. Multiple pages have been nominated for Afd in the same process. The Afd's are not broken. See the reply. Janbrogger 22:10, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I don't mean to be rude, but this edit seems to be a bit rude in the midst of this discussion.. did you delete it simply becasue User:Tancarville wrote it? 「ѕʀʟ·
  • Do you really know what your doing by deleting all of the Maltese nobility? There are already previous requests for deletion and some were deleted and some were not. If its all based on references then check and ask. Tancarville 08:39, 21 July 2006 (EST)
    • Do you really know... Janbrogger, I don't have a vested interest in whether to keep these or not. But you might want to be careful about making edits to things .. I know I keep harping on Mġarr, but it seemed that you cast a broad net of suspicion ("questionable source..").. asking a question about Verifiability is great, I am all for that. That's what keeps things honest and of high quality here. But if you aren't as familiar with the subject matter it might be good to leave things as questions and talk them out in talk pages rather than making edits while discussion is still going on. That's what seems (and I say seems) hostile. I really mean this as friendly criticism, and the hopes that we can work together to improve Wikipedia. As part of this I am increasing some of my requests to get more verifiable data on here. I wrote the Mġarr local council, maybe someone on there would even step in. Also, if I didn't mention it before, please feel free to stop by the WP:MALTA message board any time. Saħħa (health)... 「ѕʀʟ·07:37, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • References to the Maltese Nobility:

· The Adami Collection The Adami Collection

· Burkes Peerage, Baronetage and Knightage of the UK.-Various editions.

· Cassar Desain, Marchese L.A., " Genealogia della famiglia Testaferrata di Malta." Malta, 1880.

· Crispo Albero Genealogical ed Istorico della Famiglia Crispo, Messina, 1797.

· De Piro, N., "Casa Rocco Piccola", The Conde' Nast Publications 1999.' Http://www.vol.net.mt/casarocca '

· Gauci,C.A.," The Genealogy and Heraldry of the Noble Families of Malta", Gulf Publishing Ltd, Malta, 1981.

· Gauci,C.A.," The Genealogy and Heraldry of the Noble Families of Malta, Volume Two", Publishers Enterprises Group (PEG) Ltd, 1992.

· Gauci,C.A and Mallet, P.,"The Palaeologos Family- A Genealogical Review" ,Publishers Enterprises Group (PEG) Ltd, 1985

· Gauci, C.A.," A Guide to the Maltese Nobility", Publishers Enterprise Group (PEG) Ltd, Malta, 1986.

· Giles Ash, S., "The Nobility of Malta", Publishers Enterprises Group (PEG) Ltd, 1988.

  • Have you not read the above references. These books cover the Barony of Tabria extensively and persistenly. Why pick on Tabria when all the other Maltese titles are being satisfied. You were one of those who tried to have the Maltese nobility deleted. Have you not learnt your lesson? I shall in the next week slowly cite pages and add ISBN's to these books where possible. If you even try to locate these authors you may also find they are REAL!!!. Lastly, I am an author who has written alot on the Maltese nobility as a whole. This hasnt caused a problem with wikipedia for a long time. Its only caused you and a small ban of people distressed and persist on banning the lot. Read Tabria's history and if you still have a deliema to either email myself or leave a message on my profile. Count Charles Said-Vassallo 14:11, 23 March 2007 (EST)

Two things...

[edit]

WRT this, that page isn't meant to request blocks, rather to serve as a file for notorious vandals and malefactors so people can recognize and respond to them.

Second, is the a connexion between Jan Brøgger and your username? 68.39.174.238 12:14, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'd just like to mention to you that I have translated this article which you originally created on the bokmål Wikipedia. __meco 11:55, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

October 2009

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page File:H1N1 Norway.svg has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 12:33, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article British International School of Stavanger has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non-notable school. Zero references for verifiability or notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~a (usertalkcontribs) 22:00, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiversity Journal of Medicine, an open access peer reviewed journal with no charges, invites you to participate

[edit]

Hi

Did you know about Wikiversity Journal of Medicine? It is an open access, peer reviewed medical journal, with no publication charges. You can find more about it by reading the article on The Signpost featuring this journal.

We welcome you to have a look the journal. Feel free to participate.

You can participate in any one or more of the following ways:

The future of this journal as a separate Wikimedia project is under discussion and the name can be changed suitably. Currently a voting for the same is underway. Please cast your vote in the name you find most suitable. We would be glad to receive further suggestions from you. It is also acceptable to mention your votes in the wide-reach@wikiversityjournal.org email list. Please note that the voting closes on 16th August, 2016, unless protracted by consensus, due to any reason.

DiptanshuTalk 14:07, 11 August 2016 (UTC) -on behalf of the Editorial Board, Wikiversity Journal of Medicine.[reply]

Nomination of Letterland for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Letterland is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Letterland until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Guy (Help!) 16:05, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Janbrogger. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Julia furuta-toy.jpg needs authorship information

[edit]
Dear uploader:

The media file you uploaded as File:Julia furuta-toy.jpg appears to be missing information as to one (or more) of the following :

  1. The author or creators of the work, (including information as to the author's lifespan).
  2. Where and how this particular version was obtained.
  3. When the work was created,

If you did provide such information, it is currently confusing for others trying to make use of the image.

It would be appreciated if you would consider updating the file description page, to make the authorship of the media clearer.

Although some images may not need author information in obvious cases, (such where an applicable source is provided), authorship information aids users of the image, and helps ensure that appropriate credit is given (a requirement of some licenses).

  • If you created this media yourself, please consider explicitly including your user name, for which: {{subst:usernameexpand|Janbrogger}} will produce an appropriate expansion,
    or use the {{own}} template.

Please also add authorship and sourcing to other files you created or uplopaded. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.


If you have any questions please see Help:File page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:32, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:32, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Better source request for File:Julia furuta-toy.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:

You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:33, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Janbrogger. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Janbrogger. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]