Talk:Adjunction space
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]The first example probably was an attempt to show how all CW-complexes are built up, but the description was too vague so I replaced it with a specific example of a CW-complex which is easier to describe for now. - Gauge 05:42, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
disjoint union
[edit]At the risk of being fussy, I suggest that the symbol for disjoint union operation be changed to or from the present to be consistent with the article Disjoint union. - Subh83 (talk | contribs) 19:51, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
- Never mind that. The present notation is the standard for topological spaces. - Subh83 (talk | contribs) 19:55, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
- Well, I studied quite a bit of topology (years ago) and the symbol confused me - it looks like a damaged upper-case with Roman lettering type serifs or . Perhaps we could link the symbol to the article Disjoint union? yoyo (talk) 08:34, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
Some history, please
[edit]We need more information in the article, for example:
- What's the history of the term "adjunction space"?
- Who first used it?
- Who first defined it?
- Why use "adjunction"?
- And does it relate to a natural notion of "adjunct" elements in the space?
- If so, how is the adjunct element defined?
yoyo (talk) 10:14, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
Start a discussion about improving the Adjunction space page
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "Adjunction space" page.