Jump to content

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Eurovision

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Home
Talk
Article
Alerts
Assessment
Quality
Articles
Popular
Pages
Formatting
& Guidance
News DeskArchiveMembers

Sources: eurovisionartists.nl / natfinals.50webs.com

[edit]

Just to alert you that a discussion on these two websites is going on at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Eurovision/Sources. There is no consensus so far, you are welcome to have your say! EurovisionLibrarian (talk) 17:57, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Issue with logo image

[edit]

File:Eurovision Young Musicians 2024 logo.png Hey all, does anybody know how to fix this or could find a better alternative? Thanks, Fort esc (talk) 23:18, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @Fort esc, I have just updated it to a black version, thanks for bringing this up! Aris Odi ❯❯❯ talk 03:54, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Broadcaster in the infobox song contest national year

[edit]

Hi. I don't know if this has ever been discussed before, but I'm wondering why the participating broadcaster is not in the Infobox song contest national year, when it is actually the one entering the contest. Ferclopedio (talk) 08:39, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, why is it not? — IмSтevan talk 08:40, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That's a really good question, it really should include that. Aris Odi ❯❯❯ talk 11:20, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I hadn't considered this. I support changing the infobox to include this. Ktkvtsh (talk) 16:08, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
OK. Is four enough quorum? Anyway, I'm going to request the change on the talk page of the template. Let's see if some kind soul will listen to us. Ferclopedio (talk) 19:54, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I oppose this. The infobox is not a in depth view of the participation's entire background for the year and in most cases, the broadcaster is a stable and the same each year. I'm not sure what adding this "adds" for the reader. Grk1011 (talk) 20:57, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The contest is a competition between broadcasters, adding the participating broadcaster is not a vision of depth but is one of the fundamental data of the article, which should also appear prominently in the lead section. Of course there are broadcasters that have been stable over the years, but there are cases where they have not been, such as in France, Belgium, Germany, and Russia, to give just a couple of examples of the seventeen that I have counted. Ferclopedio (talk) 21:21, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Flags or hearts

[edit]

Why are we utilizing default flags in tables and infoboxes when heart-flags of Eurovision are available to us? Much like Olympic pictograms on its pages, surely we could utilize a part of Eurovision's branding and recognizability on its pages, as such:

First semi-final of the Eurovision Song Contest 2024
R/O Country Artist Song Points Place
1 Moldova Natalia Barbu "In the Middle" 20 4
2 Cyprus Silia Kapsis "Liar" 67 2
3 Serbia Teya Dora "Ramonda" 47 3
4 Lithuania Silvester Belt "Luktelk" 119 1
5 Iceland Hera Björk "Scared of Heights" 3 5

IмSтevan talk 15:59, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edit: These flags are also all in the same dimensions, which would create consistency — IмSтevan talk 18:16, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think this is a great idea. I support the use of these instead of the rectangle flags for Eurovision related tables such as the example above. Ktkvtsh (talk) 16:07, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think such a change is absolutely pointless. It may be branding but we're not here for branding, are we? And also I personally don't like it esthetically... Yoyo360 (talk) 16:39, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with Yoyo360, I don't think these look good at all, and the Wikipedia article that you linked literally has flags in their respective rectangular shapes on it Spleennn (talk) 18:58, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I was talking about sports pictograms — IмSтevan talk 19:04, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, and I was talking about flags. I don't understand the logic in changing how the flags on one Wikipedia page look according to the way that sport pictograms look on a different page, when the same page has flags that look exactly how the current flags on Eurovision Wikipedia look. Spleennn (talk) 19:55, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The point was that it's not unprecedented to use icons in tables like that. I suggested it because these hearts are tied to these countries' presence at the contest, but perhaps it makes sense not to use them as they didn't even exist until 2004 — IмSтevan talk 20:16, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I'm not sure that the use of the heart-flags can be applied in a general way, for several reasons.
- First, as it is noted on the page where it lists them: "heart-flags are not adopted until Eurovision Song Contest (ESC) 2004, Junior Eurovision Song Contest (JESC) 2008, and never exist in Eurovision Young Dancers (EYD), Eurovision Young Musicians (EYM) and Eurovision Magic Circus Show (EMCS)", so the use of heart-flags in a general way, besides being weird, is not historically accurate. In addition, we have two versions of the heart-flags, the one 2004-14 and the 2015-present, and the one corresponding to the year in question should be used. This would lead us to the flags being displayed differently depending on the year.
- Second, that the use of the heart-flags means to modify the Country in the Eurovision Song Contest template according to everything said above. An additional year (or flag shape version) parameter will have to be added to the template so that it can display the correct flag, which means that it would have to be edited every time that the template is used to set the corresponding year (flag shape version).
- Third, the fact that rectangular flags were used some years and heart-shaped flags other years leads to the question of what to do with the most relevant flag, the large flag in the Infobox song contest country. Should it be rectangular or heart-shaped?. If it is heart-shaped, you have to make sure it is displayed correctly in the infobox, in the Wikipedia search box, and in the pop-ups when hovering over links. Either way it would not be coherent in either case, since there would be three different shaped flags all over the years. Ferclopedio (talk) 20:26, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@ImStevan, I just read your last reply just after finishing writing my long paragraph. Let it be noted that I don't dislike the idea, but I'm not sure its application is possible when taking into account all the cases. Ferclopedio (talk) 20:49, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose any changes from the standard official flags to the heart ones, this is a general encyclopedia and not one just for Eurovision fans. -- AxG /   21:28, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. This is starting to creep towards a MOS:FLAG violation. The flags as they are used now are to aid in identification of the countries. Using heart variants makes it instead a type of decoration. Grk1011 (talk) 20:53, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Venue Coordinates

[edit]

I am wondering if everyone would be okay with me adding coordinates of host venues to Eurovision articles. All it would do is feature the venue coordinates in the title of the page. Ktkvtsh (talk) 20:09, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would prefer it as a part of the infobox, as a part of the venue value — IмSтevan talk 20:48, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I wonder if it's really necessary to add that. The articles are about events, not venues, and the coordinates are in the corresponding venue article after all. Ferclopedio (talk) 07:57, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think it is making it about the venue, I think it is more about where the event was located in general. Isn't that what the (add coordinates) space is for? Ktkvtsh (talk) 21:16, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Noted. Thanks. I won't proceed with it. Ktkvtsh (talk) 15:52, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Eurovizija.LT

[edit]

Should we create the Eurovizija.LT page instead of it being a redirect to Lithuania in Eurovision 2024? Ktkvtsh (talk) 17:47, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

For now it only had one edition so let's keep it together — IмSтevan talk 18:26, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]