Talk:Battle of Camden
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
vandalism
[edit]An anon has altered the casualty numbers today, but without a source for new or old, I can't tell if it's vandalism or a correction. Stan 03:16, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
Battle section
[edit]I think most of the information in the Battle section - everything from the sentence about Greene - is out of place in this article, since it's not actually about the battle. At the very least it should be moved into the aftermath section, but I don't think it should be in here at all -- Hirudo 05:36, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
Vandalism
[edit]Someone has vandalized part of the beginnings of this article, (ie: "The threatening situation on the moon alarmed the retards"), however I don't know what was there originally so I cannot fix it. Help?Meh. 05:55, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
Was this written by a descendant of Gates?
[edit]Gate's abandonment of his command by fleeing the battle at its pinnacle is legendary, and more importantly, historically documented beyond any doubt. He fled the battle faster and farther than any American commander before or since, even given the advances of technology and transportation. Horatio Gates is viewed historically by the British as their best weapon against the Colonials, given his success in discrediting Arnold and targeting and almost removing Washington.
It takes a very, very loyal descendant to Gates to not include this perspective in the article. Such descendants can only hope readers do not admire the full extent of Gates' treachery and incompetence as documented best in PBS' documentary on the Revolution Liberty! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.11.85.188 (talk) 23:50, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
Even within wikipedia, a more accurate assessment of Gates' performance is described as "Gates's principal accomplishment in the unsuccessful campaign was to cover 170 miles (270 km) in three days on horseback, heading north in retreat." Horatio_Gates — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.11.85.188 (talk) 23:56, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
The 1781 engagement under Greene was also notable, and somebody should write about it. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 14:09, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
De Kalb shot eleven times?
[edit]The Wikipedia article on De Kalb states that he received three musket wounds, while this one states eleven. Whichever is correct (and surviving three days with eleven musket wounds seems rather less likely), the two articles should perhaps be made to at least agree. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.180.175.183 (talk) 05:55, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
Start a discussion about improving the Battle of Camden page
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "Battle of Camden" page.
- C-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- C-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- C-Class South Carolina articles
- High-importance South Carolina articles
- WikiProject South Carolina articles
- WikiProject United States articles
- C-Class military history articles
- C-Class British military history articles
- British military history task force articles
- C-Class European military history articles
- European military history task force articles
- C-Class North American military history articles
- North American military history task force articles
- C-Class United States military history articles
- United States military history task force articles
- C-Class Early Modern warfare articles
- Early Modern warfare task force articles
- C-Class American Revolutionary War articles
- American Revolutionary War task force articles