Template talk:Reproductive system
Appearance
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
Suggested modifications
[edit]- Title: use "Mammalian Reproductive System" rather than "Reproductive System"
- Organization: as suggested in Wikipedia:Templates_for_deletion, something like "intersex", but better would be "Common"
- Organization: I think I see where some people might get upset ... "Female" above "Male". Is there some way to put them side-by-side? But then do we have to worry about "left" vs. "right" as the dominant or inferior position?
- Content: I think we should add some cell biology here, "sperm" and "egg" at the least.
Courtland 21:26, 2005 Mar 4 (UTC)
- Tfd appears to have failed. I have removed the notice.
- I see no problem with the "woman on top" arrangement. Her participation in reproduction is >1000 that of the male in terms of time :-)
- I agree with your suggestion of expansion.
- As for adding "mammalian" - this just confuses. JFW | T@lk 23:36, 10 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- I support a change to 'mammalian reproductive system'. ike9898 19:45, July 10, 2005 (UTC)
Start a discussion about improving the Template:Reproductive system page
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "Template:Reproductive system" page.