Jump to content

Talk:FAST TCP

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

questions

[edit]

How does FAST TCP work? And, what is the problem with traditional tcp?

What are comparisons to speed/capability differences between traditional tcp and fast tcp?

How was fast tcp tested? and are the results applicable to the networks we use on a daily basis?

who owns FAST TCP and how is it being deployed?

If anyone could help me that'd be great! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.170.88.9 (talkcontribs) 29 November 2004

one path

[edit]

The article states: "Traditional TCP limits itself to only one path.". Is that really true? It surprised me, but i don't really have time to research it now... --Raboof 14:35, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)

FAST TCP and modem/DSL: Apples and oranges

[edit]

`FAST TCP uses 10 parallel routes and can transfer up to 8,609 Megabits per second. This is 153,000 times faster than the average modem and 6,000 times faster than an ordinary DSL line.'

This is a nonsensical comparision for obvious reasons. I think it should be removed.--Raboof 12:11, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
I strongly agree. To compare a transport layer protocol with a subnet protocol like modem or DSL is complete nonsense. It is like stating that an UPS-Express-Packet is much faster than a bicycle - Chris
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on FAST TCP. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:41, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on FAST TCP. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:42, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]