Jump to content

Talk:GNOME Files

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

nautilus

[edit]

Anyone feel up to writing a description of "spatial" as relates to file managers -- and Nautilus in particular? The link to spatial in the article was all but irrelevant. I should warn anyone attempting it... it's probably best not to use Nicholas Petreley's article as a source ;-) Motor 14:28, 13 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]


Improvements

[edit]

The screenshot with the browser mode should include the browser sidebar which enables a view to the directory tree.

It should also show them as they might actually be used. Showing the result of double-clicking on "Computer", "Filesystem", "usr", and "bin" doesn't actually show something that anybody would actually use it for (when was the last time you opened these windows, just like that?). How about something like a window showing ~/Photos/, with a bunch of digital photo thumbnails?

Anyone really familiar with Nautilus up for filling in its entry in Comparison of file managers??? There are lots of holes in terms of what Nautilus can do.

How is the name of the file manager a pun on the shell of the nautilus? Is this an obscure pun that requires explanation, or is it an esoteric use of the word "pun"? POV? The name of the line of exercise equipment is a pun on the shell (the cams used in the machines to reduce inertia vaguely resemble the cross section of the shell), but how could the name of a file manager be one? If the "pun" is based on a file manager being a tool to work with objects within a shell [pun=> shell (operating system gui)=shell (nautical fauna)], that's more than a bit of a stretch, and not really a pun; the choice of name is too random. You could just as easily have named it "Hermit Crab." Can we get an explanation or a source citation? Or is it not a pun, but a case where the software was simply named after the shell of the sea creature? Canonblack 13:09, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nautilus isn't the pun, "shell" is the pun, so let's see if we can fix it... MFNickster

List/Comparison

[edit]

I don't see any point in having both List and Comparison... I picked "List of" for the time being... but I've also posted on Talk:Comparison of file managers asking what's happening with the merge between that and List of file managers. - Motor (talk) 15:09, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Move

[edit]

Shouldn't this be at Nautilus (file manager), as it seems a better place? bruce89 14:57, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think it matters much, plus people writing nautilus file manager don't need to pipe link it like this: nautilus file manager it, which helps keep the page sources cleaner. Pro or anti arguments are all pretty minor here. I'd just leave it as it is unless there's a real need to move it. - Motor (talk) 15:03, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It has been moved, thank you. bruce89 17:31, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Problems

[edit]

Why don't you cover the way it locks up X windows —Preceding unsigned comment added by Br0dely (talkcontribs) 14:13, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

and tries to take up all my ram and do everything i have other programs for —Preceding unsigned comment added by Petchboo (talkcontribs) 20:49, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Original Author.

[edit]

There should be a section about the creator of nautilus and how he used his experience designing the user interface of the macintosh.

Do you have a reliable source to back up these claims? ~~ [ジャム][t - c] 21:36, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GNOME Files

[edit]

I noticed that Nautilus (file manager) has been recently moved to GNOME Files. However, I don't find any reliable source for the information about the GNOME Files in the article. --Ykhwong (talk) 12:07, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on GNOME Files. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:59, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:28, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]