Talk:Epistemic minimalism
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Removed from the article:
It is somewhat stubby because I lack the time and expertise to give a proper exploration of the different sorts of epistemic minimalism, the motivations behind it, and the precise arguments for and against it. Someone who has more of these scarce resources than I could do a great service by summarizing some of these issues. Also, there are many varieties of epistemic minimalism, and a taxonomy of these varities would also be helpful. Please edit at will.
Hurrah for Crispin Sartwell
[edit]Just a note that ever since I took Epistemology in undergraduate philosophy back in 1994, I've always thought that the so-called "Gettier Problem" is flawed (i.e. that there is no problem) and that justification was not needed for knowledge (i.e., knowledge=true belief). I wrote a draft paper about it back then and asked the dean of the department to look it over. He wasn't very encouraging. I've only recently become aware of Sartwell's article in 1991 and wish I had known about it way back when. —B|Talk 21:40, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
Start a discussion about improving the Epistemic minimalism page
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "Epistemic minimalism" page.
- Stub-Class Philosophy articles
- Low-importance Philosophy articles
- Stub-Class epistemology articles
- Low-importance epistemology articles
- Epistemology task force articles
- Stub-Class Analytic philosophy articles
- Low-importance Analytic philosophy articles
- Analytic philosophy task force articles
- Stub-Class Contemporary philosophy articles
- Low-importance Contemporary philosophy articles
- Contemporary philosophy task force articles