Talk:Troodon
Appearance
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present. |
There should probably be more information on the Prince Creek Remains
[edit]The page mentions that Troodon fossils there are from much larger species, but we should probably have the exact sizes listed Crylophosaurus (talk) 20:36, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Not sure if much has been published on it, and I suspect it will be named as a new genus, so the info won't belong here anyway in the end. FunkMonk (talk) 22:03, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- highly doubt it is a new genus, but okay Crylophosaurus (talk) 06:26, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Even if it isn't a new genus, it might just as well be Stenonychosaurus. Better to wait until there's actually a publication that determines it. FunkMonk (talk) 13:44, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- highly doubt it is a new genus, but okay Crylophosaurus (talk) 06:26, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Wut...
[edit]... the heck you mean "potentially dubious"? Troodon is nothing but a nomen dubium, no potentially, because it's indeed dubious Touch some grass (talk) 09:06, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
- A group of researchers is still using the name for specimens from the Two Medicine Formation, so it is quite a bit less settled than that. FunkMonk (talk) 14:10, 28 June 2024 (UTC)